設為首頁  加入最愛網
會員中心 贊助提供 徵求志工 線上電台 優惠精品 合作夥伴 關於我們 連絡我們
 
         
  首頁 > 影音網>勇往直前保台灣Go Fight for Taiwan
勇往直前保台灣Go Fight for Taiwan

[轉載自:民報]

[謝鎮寬]於2022-06-22 13:06:06上傳[]

 





勇往直前保台灣
Go Fight for Taiwan

歷來中國醜陋嘴臉

中國歷來橫霸臉,聲嘶力竭吠火車;聯大咆哮伍休權,惱怒恫嚇朱鎔基。
誰理你們沙祖康,嗺戰不遠遲浩田;不惜一戰魏鳳和,非戰綱領習近平。
今日普皇慘兮兮,明日潦倒習大大;恃強終必遭天譴,古往征戰幾留存。
台灣人民當覺醒,保衛家園上前線;哭泣無法保安全,唯有戰鬥贏尊嚴。

奧魏香格里拉對話

2022年6月10日晚間第19屆「香格里拉對話」(Shangri-La Dialogue)在新加坡拉開序幕,美國國防部長奧斯汀(Lloyd Austin)與中國國防部長魏鳳和在開議前先舉行會談,雙方都堅持各自對台灣的立場。魏鳳和強調「一中原則」是中美關係的政治基礎,叫美國不要干涉中國內政;奧斯汀則向中方重申,在一中政策的指引下對台政策不變,並強調台海穩定的重要性,呼籲中方不要破壞長期的穩定和平。雙方言詞針鋒相對,頗有高手過招的架勢。

解放三不嗆美四不

魏鳳和說:「台灣屬於中國,是中國的內政問題,祖國統一絕對要實現,外部勢力干涉絕不會得逞。」他以1861至1865年間的美國南北戰爭為例,指出美國當年為國家統一打了南北戰爭,中國非常不願意發生「內戰」,但堅決粉碎任何「台獨」圖謀。他還重申解放軍對台新三不,「如果有人膽敢把台灣分裂出去,我們一定會不惜一戰、不惜代價、不二選擇,中國一定會打到底。」同時也對美嗆聲、提出四不:「不要抹黑中國、不要打壓中國、不要干預中國、不要損害中國。」

一中台關三中六保

奧斯汀則明確表示,美國堅守長期奉行的一中政策,對台政策沒有改變;始終以《台灣關係法》、美中三公報及六項保證為基礎。美國反對任何一方片面改變現狀,美國不支持台灣獨立,堅持台海兩岸分歧務必以和平方式解決爭端。在一中政策下,美國持續履行台灣關係法的承諾,包括協助台灣、維持足夠自我防衛能力。這代表維持自我能力,以抵抗恐危害台灣人民安全、社會或經濟體系的武力或其他任何形式的脅迫。奧斯汀強調,美國的政策沒有改變,但北京卻並非如此,中國增加在台灣附近的挑釁軍事行為破壞穩定,這包括近幾個月共機擾台數量創新高,且幾乎每天都有這樣的動作。

盧森堡會各自表述

緊接著奧魏會,於2022年6月13 日,由美國白宮國家安全顧問蘇利文,與中共中央外事工作委員會辦公室主任、兼中央政治局委員楊潔篪,兩人在盧森堡會晤,針對台灣、南海、烏俄戰爭及北韓核計畫等議題,進行長達四.五小時的「坦率」討論。兩人雖未重演美中兩國防長近日在新加坡「香格里拉對話」的嚴詞交鋒,但在核心歧見上仍各執己見。因兩人都各自具有、國家元首安全諮詢,高級顧問的身份,所以此次會談最主要的任務,應該就是為「拜習會」鋪路。蘇利文在會中重申美國長期的「一個中國」政策,但對「中國大陸在台灣海峽兩岸的脅迫和侵略行動,表示擔憂」,他明確地表達了美國所持的基本立場與關切;針對台灣及台海,美國要確保台海的和平與穩定,也持續強調反對片面改變現狀。

狂指台海中國內海

儘管兩人於會談中沒有出現,類似香格里拉對話時的衝突;但中國外交部於13日表示,中國對台灣海峽享有「主權、主權權利和管轄權」,還說「國際海洋法上根本沒有『國際水域』一說」,有關國家稱台灣海峽為國際水域,是操弄涉台議題,威脅中國主權安全。美國國務院發言人普萊斯(Ned Price)則透過路透社的電郵中表示:「台灣海峽是一條國際水道,這意味著台灣海峽是公海自由的區域,根據國際公約保障之下,具有包括航行和飛越的自由。」他補充說,台灣海峽的和平穩定對世界有長遠利益,對更廣大印太地區的安全與繁榮極為重要。美國十分關切中國、針對台灣的侵略性言論和脅迫活動,美國將繼續在國際法允許的任何地方飛行、航行和執行任務,包括通過台灣海峽。

習唱非戰行動綱要

2022年6月15日,一則由習近平以中國國家主席、中共中央軍委主席身份發布的《軍隊非戰爭軍事行動綱要(試行)》,作為解放軍執行「非戰爭軍事行動」提供法源依據,於當天正式實施。習近平所頒布的非戰爭軍事行動指令,頗為類似普廷發動,侵略烏克蘭的特別軍事行動布達;把台灣海峽納為中國內海,也雷同普廷所說地,要烏克蘭進行去軍事化和去納粹化,就是要台灣聽命於他的擺佈、棄械投降、任其宰割。真是鬼話連篇、放空氣。

狗吠火車年已七三

台灣人民當然不是被嚇大的,自1949年中共建國後,就從來不曾擁有過台灣的主權、產權、治權、債權及任何權益;真是愛說笑,無時無刻都在做它的春秋大夢,想併吞台灣。然而73年已經過去了,台灣卻依舊是安然無恙。雖然中國現在國強力壯,但因習近平獨裁、孤意寡斷,滿腦子就想當皇帝,開人類文明倒車、不得民心,早已得罪歐美民主社會。若他哪天吃錯藥,膽敢下令發動軍事侵略,相信美、日、韓、澳、印的導彈,早已瞄準中南海萬彈齊發;當然台灣也絕不是省油的燈,不信那就等著瞧吧。

馬關割讓恩斷義絕

中國口口聲聲說台灣是它的,可是卻拿不任何法理文件,或國際條約來證明,真是鬼畫符、徒見其蠻橫、無理取鬧。若要叫台灣人民心服口服,就拿出任何有效文件來証明,光拿出聯合國第2758號決議文是不管用的。因為那只是授權,中華人民共和國為,當今中國唯一的合法政府代表,但卻與台灣的主權沒,有絲毫的交集與瓜葛。台灣自1895年被中國,依據馬關條約將其完整主權、永久割讓給日本後,就與中國恩斷義絕、田無溝、水無流,沒有丁點關係。日本雖然於1951年,依據舊金山和平條約,宣布放棄台彭的治權、產權與債權,卻仍擁有台灣的剩餘主權。且和平條約,並沒有指定任何主權接收者,只授權指定美國為台灣二戰後的主要佔領權國。這些都是國際社會,大家共同遵守的約定,相信偌大的中國社會,應該是有人看得懂國際條約才是;如國沒有,歡迎到舊金山戰爭紀念歌劇院來取經。

中華憲法要代表誰

那美國既然身為台灣的主要佔領權國,是如何來掌管台灣事務呢?相信這是大家最所關心的議題,容我在此提出探討。首先要指出的是與台灣糾纏不清的中華民國,他有一部既不代表中國也不代表台灣的憲法,卻要台灣人民去接受信奉,這可真是滑天下之大稽;因為中國有他們自己的中華人民共和國憲法。中華民國憲法草案於1946年12月25日,由制憲國民大會在南京決議通過,1947年1月1日由國民政府公布,1947年12月25施行,蔣介石是依據中華民國憲法選出的第一任總統,他於1948年5月20日宣誓就職。中國共產黨從頭到尾沒有參與制憲行憲,而是自己制定中華人民共和國憲法;所以中華民國憲法,是一部沒有國家、人民與土地的特異天書,卻在台灣施行,您說怪不怪?

一號軍令開啟佔領

1945年9月2日麥克阿瑟將軍,依據第一號軍令General Order No.1,授權蔣介石接受在台澎日軍投降,而開啟台澎的軍事佔領。但蔣介石的國民黨政府,卻於1945年10月25日,在台北公會堂接受日軍投降的典禮,詮釋為台灣光復;更離譜的是於1946年1月12日,由行政院下令將台灣人強行入籍中華民國;1947年2月28日更在台灣展開二二八大屠殺,這些都屬國際戰犯行為。1949年10月1日,毛澤東宣佈建立中華人民共和國,蔣介石與其子蔣經國於當年12月10日亡命逃到台灣,並於1950年3月1日自行宣布復職,繼續擔任國家元首總統職務,在國際社會宣稱代表整個中國。但在美國的認知,該政府只是代理執行協防台灣。1950年11月30日聯合國安全理事會,於第530次會議作出9:1判決,否決中國指控美國侵略中國領土台灣。1951年9月8日簽署舊金山和平條約,該約於1952年4月28日正式生效,美國正式被授權為台灣的主要佔領權國。1954年12月3日中美簽署共防禦條約,蔣介石政府其實只是擔任負責協防台灣的職務,該約於1979於1月1日被台灣關係法取代,於1980年1月1日正式走入歷史。

台灣地位自己決定
                                                                                          台灣關係法第十五條第二款,明確詮釋中華民國政府的角色與地位:『「臺灣」一詞將視情況需要,包括臺灣及澎湖列島,這些島上的人民、公司及根據適用於這些島嶼的法律而設立或組成的其他團體及機構,1979年1月1日以前美國承認為中華民國的臺灣治理當局,以及任何接替的治理當局(包括政治分支機構、機構等)。』在美國政府認知,所謂的中華民國政府,其實只是台灣的治理當局,並不是一個主權獨立的國家。2004年10月25日美國前國務卿鮑爾說:「中國只有一個,台灣沒有獨立,它不享有作為一個國家的主權。這仍然是我們的政策,我們堅定的政策。2007 年 8 月 30 日,美國國家安全委員會(NSC)亞洲事務高級主任韋德寧說:「台灣或中華民國,在這個時間點上,還不是國際社會所承認的一個國家。美國政府的立場是 中華民國 - 中華民國 - 是一個懸而未決的問題,正如您所知,它已經懸而未決很多很多年了。2009 年 4 月 7 日 美國巡迴法官布朗說:過去六十年中美關係動盪,將台灣居民困在政治煉獄中。 在此期間,台灣人民生活在,沒有任何一致承認的政府情況下。2020年11月12日美國前國務卿龐培歐說:台灣從來就不是中國的一部分。2021年11月16日拜登總統說:「它的獨立,他們自己做決定。啥事都沒有發生,我們根本不會改變我們的政策。 […] 他們必須做出決定,是台灣他們,而不是我們。我們不鼓勵獨立。我們鼓勵他們完全按照《台灣關係法》的要求行事。」

不是獨立而是建國

2022年5月5日,美國國務院在美台關係事實清單上,把原有「認知中國立場、只有一個中國,及台灣是中國的一部分」、「美國不支持台灣獨立」等文字刪除。2022年5月28日該事實清單改版寫著:「我們反對任何一方單方片面改變現狀,我們不支持台獨;我們期待兩岸分歧以和平方式解決。我們對台海地區的和平與穩定始終懷有持久的利益。」台灣社會對於登刪「美國不支持台獨」非常在意,其實大可不必。因為台灣人自己,並沒有說清楚講明白,到底要向誰要求獨立,向中國、中華人民共和國、中華民國,還是向日本,或向美國要求獨立?台灣既不隸屬於中國,為何還要向它要求獨立呢?當然不需要、也不必要。台灣所欠缺的是建立自己的國家,對建國與獨立有別,台灣所需要是的是建國,而不是獨立。

不要等死奮起戰鬥

在紛爭的國際社會,我們看到霸權的專橫;烏克蘭雖曾被蘇聯統治過,但這次人民為了抵抗俄羅斯的入侵,大家都能團結一致抗敵真是難能可貴。在載浮載沈的大千世界,烏克蘭人民是如何經由橘色革命洗禮,而凝聚了反霸權的意志。台灣在面對中國一再地軟土深掘,機艦三餐擾台的霸凌下,必須要有誓死保衛家園的決心,才能確保台灣免於被併吞。從烏克蘭流離失所的難民祈禱中,我們聽到他們真誠地告白:哭泣懦弱無法換來自由與安全,只有參與戰鬥,才能贏得尊敬和尊嚴。勇往直前保台灣,絕不屈服歹厝邊。

謝鎮寬
加州、海沃

https://www.peoplenews.tw/articles/2eaed3cbff
https://www.peoplenews.tw/articles/5af5f09b97
民報
【專文】勇往直前保台灣(ㄧ)
【專文】勇往直前保台灣(二)
2022/06/17・ 12:02 ・14:03 謝鎮寬 (加州、海沃)
Go Fight for Taiwan

The ugly faces China always have

China has always been domineering and barking at trains; Wu Hsiu-chuan roared at UNSC and Zhu Ronggi shouted angrily.

Sa Chukang said who cares about you, Chi Haotian threated war is not far, Wei Feng-ho will fight at all costs and Xi Jinping promots Military Operations Other Than War.

Today, Putin is miserable, and tomorrow Xi will be fell; Those who abused power will be punished and
Those who launched war who is survived.

Taiwan people should wake up, grape arm to fight in the front line; crying cannot guarantee safety, only fighting earn you dignity.

Austin and Wei Shangri-La Dialogue

On the evening of June 10, 2022, the 19th "Shangri-La Dialogue" kicked off in Singapore. U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chinese Defense Minister Wei Feng-ho held talks before the meeting. Both insisted on their respective positions on Taiwan. Wei emphasized that the "one-China principle" is the political foundation of Sino-US relations and urged the US not to interfere with China's internal affairs; Austin reiterated to Chia that under the guidance of the one-China policy, the Taiwan policy will remain unchanged, and stressed the importance of stability across the Taiwan Strait, calling on China not to undermine long-term stability and peace. The words of the two sides were tit for tat, yelling like masters.

PLA 3 Nos Choking US 4 Nos

Wei Feng-ho said: "Taiwan belongs to China, and it is China's internal affairs. The reunification of the motherland will definitely be achieved, and external interference will never succeed." He took the American Civil War from 1861 to 1865 as an example and pointed out that the US launched N-S War for national reunification. China was very reluctant to have a "civil war", but resolutely smashed any attempt to "Taiwan independence". He also reiterated that the PLA has 3-No to Taiwan, "If someone dares to split Taiwan, we will definitely fight at all costs, and there isn’t any other choice. And warns the US "Don't smear China, don't suppress China, don't interfere with China, don't harm China."

One China Policy, TRA, 3C and 6A

Austin made it clear that the US adheres to the long-held one-China policy and has not changed its policy toward Taiwan; it has always been based on the "Taiwan Relations Act", the three US-China communiqués and the six guarantees. The US opposes any unilateral change of the status quo. The US does not support Taiwan's independence and insists that differences between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait must be resolved by peaceful means. Under the one-China policy, the US continues to fulfill its commitments under the TRA, including assisting Taiwan and maintaining adequate self-defense capabilities. This means maintaining one's ability to resist force or any other form of coercion that threatens to jeopardize the security of the people of Taiwan, the social or economic system. Austin emphasized that the U.S. policy has not changed, but Beijing is not. China has increased its provocative military actions near Taiwan to destabilize. This includes the record number of co-aircraft interference with Taiwan in recent months, and such actions are happening almost every day.

Luxembourg meeting talk respectedly

Immediately after the Austin-Wei meeting, on June 13, 2022, the White House National Security Adviser Sullivan, and Yang Jie-chi, director of the Office of the Foreign Affairs Commission of the CPC Central Committee and member of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, met in Luxembourg, targeting Taiwan and the South China Sea, the Ukraine-Russian war and North Korea's nuclear program and other issues, for up to four and five hours of "frank" discussion. Although the two did not repeat the stern confrontation between the defense ministers of the United States and China in the recent "Shangri-Shangri La Dialogue" in Singapore, they still disagree on core differences. Since both have the status of security advisors and senior advisors to the head of state, the main task of this meeting should be to pave the way for the "Biden-Xi meeting". In the meeting, Sullivan reiterated the long-term "one China" policy of the US but expressed concern about "the coercive and aggressive actions of China on both sides of the Taiwan Strait." He clearly expressed the basic position and concerns of the US; In the Taiwan Strait, the US wants to ensure peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and continues to emphasize its opposition to unilateral changes to the status quo.

Taiwan Strait isn't China's Inland Sea

Although Sullivan and Yang did not appear in the talks, like the conflict during the Shangri-La Dialogue, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said on the 13th that China enjoys "sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction" over the Taiwan Strait, adding that "there is no such thing as "in the international law of the sea". "International waters", the relevant countries call the Taiwan Strait international waters, which is manipulating Taiwan-related issues and threatening China's sovereignty and security. "The Taiwan Strait is an international waterway, which means that the Taiwan Strait is an area of freedom of the high seas, guaranteed by international conventions, including navigation and Freedom of overflight." He added that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are of long-term interest to the world and are extremely important to the security and prosperity of the wider Indo-Pacific region. The US is deeply concerned about China, aggressive rhetoric and coercive activities against Taiwan, and the US will continue to fly, sail and perform missions wherever international law allows, including through the Taiwan Strait.

Military Operation Other Than War

On June 15, 2022, a "Military Operation Other Than War (Trial)" issued by Xi Jinping in his capacity as Chinese President and Chairman of the Central Military Commission of the CCP, as a legal basis for the PLA's implementation of "non-war military operations", was issued on the same day, formally implemented. The order of non-war military operations issued by Xi Jinping is quite like Putin's special military operation order to invade Ukraine; the inclusion of the Taiwan Strait as China's internal sea is also like Putin's statement that Ukraine should be demilitarized and De-Nazification means that Taiwan should be at his mercy, surrender and let him be slaughtered. What a lot of nonsense, it makes a big air.

Dog barking train over 73 years

Of course, the people of Taiwan are not frightened. Since the founding of the PRC in 1949, they have never owned Taiwan's sovereignty, right, title, claim, or any rights. It must be a big joke to annex Taiwan. However, 73 years have passed, but Taiwan is still safe and sound. Although China is now stronger and powerful, but because Xi Jinping is dictatorial and indecisive, he wants to be an emperor with all his mind, reverses human civilization and is unpopular, and has long offended European and American democratic societies. If he takes the wrong medicine and get crazy one day and dares to order military aggression, I believe that the missiles of the US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and India have already been aimed at Chongnanhai and fired at once; of course, Taiwan is by no means a fuel-efficient lamp. If you don’t believe it, just wait, and see.

Shimonoseki Treaty cut off all relations

China keeps saying that Taiwan belongs to it, but it can't prove it with any legal documents or international treaties. If you want to convince the people of Taiwan, you need to show any valid documents to prove it. Just showing the UN Resolution 2758 will not work. Because that is just an authorization, the PRC is the only legitimate government representative of China today, but it has nothing to do with Taiwan's sovereignty, and has no connection or connection with it. Since Taiwan was ceded to Japan by China in 1895 and its whole sovereignty was ceded in perpetuity to Japan, it has no more relationship with China. Although Japan in 1951, in accordance with the San Francisco Peace Treaty, renounced all right, title and claim to Taiwan and the Pescadores, it still has the residual sovereignty of Taiwan. Moreover, the peace treaty did not designate any sovereign recipients, but only authorized the designation of the US as the principal occupying power of Taiwan after WWII. These are the agreements that the international community must abide by. I believe that in the huge Chinese society, there should be someone who be able to read and understand international treaties.

Whom ROC Constitution represent?

Since the US is the principal occupying power of Taiwan, how does the US manage Taiwan affairs? I believe this is the issue that everyone is most concerned about, so let me discuss it here. The first thing to point out is the ROC, which is entangled with Taiwan. It has a constitution that neither represents China nor Taiwan but requires the people of Taiwan to accept it. This is really a joke because China has its own the Constitution of the PRC. On December 25, 1946, the draft constitution of the ROC was passed by a resolution of the National Assembly for the Constitution in Nanjing, announced by the National Government on January 1, 1947, and implemented on December 25, 1947. Chiang Kai-shek was the first president elected according to the Constitution of the ROC. As president, he was sworn in on May 20, 1948. The CCP did not participate in the formulation and execution of the constitution from beginning to end but formulated the constitution of the PRC itself. Therefore, the constitution of the ROC is a special book without a country, people, and land, but it is implemented in Taiwan. Don’t you think it is strange?

General Order No. 1 - military occupation

On September 2, 1945, General MacArthur, in accordance with General Order No. 1, authorized Chiang Kai-shek to accept the surrender of the Japanese army in Taiwan and Penghu and started the military occupation of Taiwan and Penghu. However, CKS/KMT government accepted the surrender ceremony of the Japanese army at the Taipei Public Hall on October 25, 1945, which was interpreted as the restoration of Taiwan; what is even more outrageous is that on January 12, 1946, the Executive Yuan ordered the Taiwanese to be forcibly enforced. Naturalization of the ROC; on February 28, 1947, the 228 massacre was launched in Taiwan, all of which are acts of international war criminals. On October 1, 1949, Mao Zedong announced the establishment of the PRC. CKS and his son Chiang Ching-kuo fled to Taiwan on December 10, 1949, and announced their reinstatement on March 1, 1950, claiming to represent the whole of China in the international community. However, in the perception of the US, the government is only acting as an agent to assist in the defense of Taiwan. On November 30, 1950, the United Nations Security Council made a 9:1 judgment at its 530th meeting, rejecting China's accusation that the US had invaded Taiwan, a Chinese territory. The San Francisco Peace Treaty was signed on September 8, 1951, which entered into force on April 28, 1952, and the US was officially authorized as the principal occupying power of Taiwan. On December 3, 1954, ROC and the US signed the Sino-American Defense Treaty. CKS/KMT/ROC government only served as the role responsible for the defense of Taiwan. The treaty was replaced by the Taiwan Relations Act on January 1, 1979, and officially entered on January 1, 1980, to history.

Taiwan's status is determined by itself

Article 15(2) of the Taiwan Relations Act clearly interprets the role and status of the government of the ROC: 『the term "Taiwan" includes, as the context may require, the islands of Taiwan and the Pescadores, the people on those islands, corporations and other entities and associations created or organized under the laws applied on those islands, and the governing authorities on Taiwan recognized by the United States as the Republic of China prior to January 1, 1979, and any successor governing authorities (including political subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof).』 In the perception of the US government, the so-called government of the ROC is actually the governing authority on Taiwan, not a sovereign and independent country. On October 25, 2004, former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powel said: There is only one China. Taiwan is not independent. It does not enjoy sovereignty as a nation, and that remains our policy, our firm policy. August 30, 2007, Dennis Wilder, National Security Council (NSC) Senior Director for Asian Affairs said: Taiwan, or the Republic of China, is not at this point a state in the international community. The position of the United States government is that the ROC -- Republic of China -- is an issue undecided, and it has been left undecided, as you know, for many, many years. On April 7, 2009, Opinion statement of US Circuit Judge Brown: America and China’s tumultuous relationship over the past sixty years has trapped the inhabitants of Taiwan in political purgatory. During this time the people on Taiwan have lived without any uniformly recognized government. November 12, 2020, Former US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said: Taiwan was never part of China. November 16, 2021, President Joseph Biden: “Its independence, it makes its own decisions. Nothing happens, we’re not going to change our policy at all. […] They have to decide, they Taiwan, not us. And we are not encouraging independence. We’re encouraging that they do exactly what the Taiwan Act requires.”

Not independence, but establish a nation

On May 5, 2022, the U.S. Department of State deleted the original words "recognizing China's position, there is only one China, and Taiwan is a part of China" and "the United States does not support Taiwan independence" from the fact sheet of U.S.-Taiwan relations. The revised version of the fact sheet on May 28, 2022, reads: “We oppose unilateral change of the status quo by any party, and we do not support Taiwan independence; we expect cross-strait differences to be resolved peacefully. We always have a lasting commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. Interests.” Taiwanese society is very concerned about declaring "the US does not support Taiwan independence", but it is not necessary. Because the Taiwanese themselves have not made it clear who they are asking for independence from, China, the PRC, the ROC, Japan, or the US? Taiwan is not affiliated with China, why should it demand independence from it? Of course not, nor necessary. What Taiwan lacks is the establishment of its own country, which is different from independence. What Taiwan needs is the establishment of a country, not independence.

Don't wait to die but stand up to fight

In the conflicted international community, we have seen the tyranny of hegemony. Although Ukraine was once ruled by the Soviet Union, this time, to resist the Russian invasion, it is commendable that everyone can unite to resist the enemy. In a world of ups and downs, how did the Ukrainian people gather their will to fight hegemony through the baptism of the Orange Revolution? In the face of China's repeated digging of soft soil and bullying by war planes and ships, Taiwan must have the determination to defend its homeland to the death to ensure that Taiwan will not be annexed. From the prayers of displaced Ukrainian refugees, we hear their sincere confessions: Weeping and cowardice cannot be exchanged for freedom and security. Only fighting, participating in the battle can earn you respect and dignity. Go forward bravely to protect Taiwan, and never give in to the evil neighbor.

John Hsieh
Hayward, California

Advertisements